Original Research
Second-stage primary Caesarean deliveries: Are maternal complications increased?
Submitted: 18 July 2008 | Published: 30 August 2009
About the author(s)
Jagidesa Moodley, Women’s Health and HIV Research Unit and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of KwaZulu-Natal, South AfricaJaymala Devjee, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Addington Hospital, Durban, South Africa
Shaun M. Khedun, Women’s Health and HIV Research Unit and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
Tonya Esterhuizen, Programme of Biostatistics, Research Ethics and Medical Law, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
Full Text:
PDF (66KB)Abstract
Background: Second-stage Caesarean sections (CSs) are known to be associated with increased complications, but most reports originate from tertiary hospitals, which attend to high-risk patients. Complication rates may differ in district hospitals, which attend to low-risk patients.
Methods: This was a retrospective study carried out at a district maternity unit in Durban. The hospital records of all CSs over an eight-month period were reviewed, and obstetric and neonatal complications of second-stage CSs were compared with a group of first-stage CSs performed during the study period.
Results: There were 4 654 deliveries, including 1 257 CSs, in the study period. The CS rate was 27.2%. Of 617 (8.5%) emergency CSs, 53 were performed in the second stage of labour. The maternal and neonatal complication rates were low, and no statistical differences were found between the patients who had second-stage or those who had first-stage CSs, except for increased blood loss, blood-stained urine, prolonged operative times and postoperative fever for second-stage CSs.
Conclusions: Second-stage CSs performed in a district hospital are associated with increased maternal complication rates, but not with neonatal complications.
Keywords
Metrics
Total abstract views: 1922Total article views: 2165
