South Africa envisages a community-orientated approach to primary health care (PHC). Family physicians and primary care doctors have important roles to play in leading, implementing, supporting and maintaining community-orientated primary care (COPC). In this article, we define COPC, its key principles and approaches to implementing it in health services. Following this we describe the key competencies expected of family physicians and primary care doctors in leading and supporting its implementation; providing clinical support to the PHC teams and linking these teams to other parts of the health system, other sectors and the community. The required knowledge and skills underlying these competencies are also discussed and some specific tools included.
The primary health care (PHC) system in South Africa is organised around a commitment to community-orientated primary care (COPC).
The move towards COPC was driven by a desire to address the health needs of the whole population and not just those that access primary care facilities, with an emphasis on health promotion and disease prevention for both individuals and communities.
This commitment to a COPC approach is seen practically through the widespread implementation of ward-based outreach teams (WBOT).
Community orientated primary care has been defined as a continuous process by which PHC is provided to a defined community on the basis of its assessed health needs, by the planned integration of primary care practice and public health.
The need for this type of integration has also been highlighted by the response to the coronavirus pandemic – where PHC teams were instrumental in home delivery of medication,
Nine key principles of COPC have been identified in the African region (
Principles of community-orientated primary care.
Principle | Definition |
---|---|
A defined community | The community served is specifically defined, usually in geographic terms. |
A multidisciplinary team approach | COPC involves a team of health workers; typically community health workers, nurses and sometimes doctors. |
A comprehensive approach | Within the defined community a COPC approach engages people of all ages, genders and includes attention to health promotion, disease prevention, care, rehabilitation and palliation. |
An equitable approach | COPC should be accessible, appropriate, affordable and relevant to everyone in the community. Health equity may be improved. |
Analysis of local health needs and assets | COPC includes assessment of the health needs of the community as well as the inter-sectoral resources available to assist with these needs |
Prioritisation of health needs and interventions | The analysis of health needs leads to a process of prioritisation and then development of interventions to address these priorities that involve stakeholders from different sectors. |
Community participation | The analysis of health needs, prioritisation, planning and action should be done in a participatory approach with community members or structures. |
Evidence-based and scientific | COPC uses data collected from households, facilities, research and other sources to identify and respond to individual, household and community health needs. |
Service integration around users | COPC is fundamentally person-centred in how services are coordinated and continuous. |
Source: Mash R, Ray S, Essuman A, Burgueño E. Community orientated primary care in the sub-Saharan Africa context: A scoping review of different models, their effectiveness and feasibility. Br Med J Glob Health. 2019;4:e001489.
COPC, community-orientated primary care.
The process of analysing local health needs and assets, prioritising those needs, planning interventions and evaluating them can be seen as a COPC cycle (
The community-orientated primary care cycle.
The practical implementation of COPC has been articulated in a variety of settings locally and internationally.
Elements of the framework to implement community-orientated primary care in Metro Health Services, Cape Town.
The Cape Town framework for implementation of community-orientated primary care.
Key element in framework | Description |
---|---|
Geographic delineation of PHC teams | The community served by a primary care facility is defined and delineated into a series of contiguous areas that are served by a PHC team. |
Composition of the PHC team | The core PHC team consists of 10–15 community health workers (CHWs), a professional nurse, supported by a clinical nurse practitioner and primary care doctor. Each CHW is responsible for approximately 250 households or 1000 people. |
Facility-based and community-based teamwork | The primary care providers in the facility and community-based members of the PHC team must form one integrated functional team. |
Partnership of government and non-government organisations | In Cape Town, the CHWs and professional nurses are employed via non-government organisations (NGOs). Ensuring an effective partnership between these NGOs and governmental health services is vital. In other parts of the country everyone is employed directly by the government. |
Scope of practice | The scope of practice of each member of the team needs to be clearly defined. The community-based team members can work in living (e.g. households), social (e.g. religious institutions), working (e.g. local businesses) or learning spaces (e.g. schools) within the delineated community. The scope of practice is comprehensive across the life course and involves health promotion, disease prevention, treatment, rehabilitation and palliative care. |
Information system | The information system should integrate information from community-based and facility-based settings for both individuals and the community as a whole. M-health technology is particularly suited to CHWs. |
Community engagement | Health services should pursue both formal (e.g. clinic health committees) and informal (e.g. local health forums) ways of engaging with the community and ensuring their understanding and participation. |
Stakeholder engagement | Health services should engage actively with other stakeholders contributing to health in the community, for example, other primary care providers and practitioners, public and private, alternative and traditional. Inter-sectoral engagement and collaboration is also important. For example, with social services, educational services, neighbourhood watches and police. |
Training and development of PHC teams | All members of the PHC team will need training commensurate with their roles in a COPC approach. For example, CHWs will need to be trained in a generalist and comprehensive approach as many were originally focused on more targeted programmes. Nurses will need training in how to work in communities as well as supervise and support CHWs. Training may be a blend of more formal classroom based teaching and ongoing experiential learning. |
System preparation and change management | COPC requires adequate inputs to work effectively in terms of funding, resources, supplies, transport, infrastructure, workforce and information. Managers and leaders at all levels of the system need to have the same understanding and support the development of COPC. Policies need to be aligned with the COPC approach. The COPC approach needs to be communicated and explained to the public. |
Source: Mash R, Goliath C, Mahomed H, Reid S, Hellenberg D, Perez G. A framework for implementation of community orientated primary care in the Metro Health Services, Cape Town, South Africa. Afr J Prm Health Care Fam Med. 2020;12(1), a2632.
PHC, primary healthcare; COPC, community-orientated primary care.
Many of the roles and competencies around COPC stretch beyond the clinical role. However, this does not negate the need for high-quality clinical services to be provided and supported. In fact, the provision of a clinical service offers powerful opportunities to transform and build stronger links with health promotion and disease prevention strategies at the household and community levels.
The current policy direction is supportive of developing COPC approaches at primary care facilities. Family physicians are often located in districts, district hospitals, sub-districts and community health centres where they can help lead the implementation of COPC with local decision makers and implementers. Primary care doctors are also in a position to help with this for the community they serve from their facility or practice. Regardless of where they are based, their responsibility stretches beyond the walls of the institution.
Practically speaking this may involve the following activities:
Explaining the principles of COPC to other healthcare workers and managers
Collaborating with the local management team to plan and implement COPC
Assisting with the interpretation of data on the community’s health assets and health needs.
Assisting with the prioritisation of health issues in the community.
Assisting with the planning of responses or interventions to address these health issues in the community.
Participating in the implementation of these responses or interventions in the community.
Assisting with the evaluation of these responses or interventions.
Advocating for vulnerable and neglected individuals, or communities within the population served by the healthcare team.
Underlying these competencies is a need to understand and embody COPC principles, to build relationships with key role players, to analyse and interpret data, to facilitate prioritisation processes such as the nominal group technique (see
A logic model approach.
Nominal group technique for prioritisation of ideas.
Step 1 – Silent phase: Give each member of the group a piece of A4 paper on which is written the specific question that you want them to think about. Ask them to write down as many ideas or responses as they can to the question. Each person should work alone and in silence for 15–20 min.
Step 2 – Item generation, or round-robin phase: Form people into sub-groups of five or six and have each one elect a scribe. Each person then reads out one idea/response, which the scribe records on a flip chart, until all the ideas are recorded. This ensures equal participation from everyone. No discussion or comment on the ideas is allowed at this stage.
Step 3 – Item clarification phase: Each sub-group discusses the items recorded to ensure that the meaning is clear and shared by all. They can combine or edit items that duplicate or overlap, but they should not discard any items. At the end of this process, they should create a clearer and shorter list of items.
Step 4 – Voting phase: Each person must choose five items from the list that are most important to him and rank them in order of priority on a scale of 5 (most important) to 1 (least important). They write down their selection and ranking on a voting paper, all of which are then collected. Compile all the prioritised items from each sub-group into a master list, although not in rank order.
Step 5 – Reassembly of group phase: The entire group now repeats steps 3 and 4 for the master list. Collect the final voting papers and analyse them to give a final ranking of the items that the group has prioritised.
Source: Buso D, Reid S. How to make a community diagnosis and prioritise health issues. In: Mash B, Blitz J, editors. South African family practice manual. 3rd ed. Pretoria: Van Schaik, 2015; p. 497–500.
Implementation outcomes.
Source: Adapted from Peters DH, Adam T, Alonge O, Agyepong IA, Tran N. Implementation research: What it is and how to do it. Br Med J [serial online]. 2013 [cited 2019 Apr 5];347:f6753. Available from:
As a clinician you will be used to providing support to more junior doctors, nurse practitioners and others in your facility. With a COPC approach such support extends to the community-based nurses and CHWs. Community health workers may refer patients to you for help in the facility or in the community. At times this may necessitate a home visit to support the PHC team if, for example, the patient is complicated and housebound.
Family physicians usually take responsibility for leading clinical governance along with the rest of the team.
Training of other healthcare workers
For example, training CHWs in use of personal protective equipment or screening for the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), responding to problems or challenges that arise from practice
Clinical audit and feedback
For example, quality of active surveillance for tuberculosis (TB) in the community
Facilitating reflection on health information
For example, the analysis of household assessment data collected by CHWs
Implementation of new guidelines
For example, how CHWs can calculate cardiovascular risk with non-laboratory data
Review and appraise new evidence for the team
For example, value of home delivery of medication by CHWs
Participating in research to address questions that arise from practice
For example, what is the role of CHWs in non-communicable diseases
These activities also imply a wide range of underlying knowledge, skills and attitudes. Creating a learning environment is important to continuously improve and to train or teach effectively.
The family physician and primary care doctor should pay particular attention to the coordination of care within and between PHC teams. For example, help in building a strong relationship between facility-based and community-based members of the PHC team, to coordinate care for the patients. The introduction of home delivery of medication by CHWs during COVID-19, for example, necessitated much closer cooperation between clinicians, pharmacists, nurses and CHWs.
Family physicians and doctors may also be a strong link between the PHC team and the local district hospital, or higher levels of care. Multidisciplinary ward-rounds can include members of the PHC team and improve coordination of care for patients as well as improve the understanding of the hospital teams in the context of the community. It is important that each hospital, health centre and clinic has a specific plan to link COPC practice to care in the institution. This is in the form of care-coordination ward rounds, multidisciplinary patient and family discussions, well-structured referral letters, discharge summaries and patient retained records. In some hospitals a team of CHWs and a WBOT team leader works full time in the hospital to facilitate the coordination of care. This should be facilitated and supported by the family physicians and other doctors.
Family physicians and doctors should also use their leadership positions to build relationships with other sectors, particularly social services. Health and social services often go hand-in-hand and require mutual linkages and collaboration. Other sectors may be important depending on the prioritised needs of the community. For example, concern for illegal circumcision schools or crime and violence may need links to the police and neighbourhood watch, whilst concern for teenage pregnancy may need links to the educational sector. As mentioned above, this often involves a range of advocacy skills.
Family physicians and doctors should also use their leadership positions and authority to build relationships with formal and informal community structures. Participating in local community health forums may enable community engagement and participation in the COPC cycle.
Whilst such coordination and relationship building is not the sole responsibility of the family physician or other doctors, they are in a powerful position to offer leadership alongside managers and senior health professionals.
South Africa has moved towards a COPC approach to providing health services, which has tremendous potential for improving the health of communities. Family physicians and primary care doctors need to understand and embody the principles of this COPC approach so that they can help lead the health services in this direction. They will also need to provide clinical support and clinical governance to the whole PHC team engaged in COPC. They can also be instrumental in coordinating care within and between levels of the health system, supporting community and stakeholder engagement. These various roles and activities require an expanded knowledge base and skills-set, beyond the traditional clinical roles.
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
R.M. wrote the initial draft, which was revised and edited by B.G. and J.H. All authors approved the final version.
The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any affiliated agency of the authors.