Abstract
South Africa has a critical shortage of geriatricians and a growing ageing population. Most geriatric patients are cared for by their primary care practitioner who may not have been trained in the care of the older adult. The comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is the cornerstone of the geriatric consultation but can be time-consuming. By using a common sense approach to the geriatric patient, none of the important components of the CGA will be missed. The mnemonic ‘COMMON SENSE’ can be used as a tool to assist in identifying the common conditions that older adults experience, as well as highlight specific considerations that become increasingly important in this population. Many simple and time-effective screening tools are available to assist in diagnosing the geriatric syndromes which can be easily implemented in a busy primary care practice.
Keywords: common sense; screening tools; geriatrics syndromes; comprehensive geriatric assessment; common geriatric conditions.
Introduction
The number of people aged 65 years and above in South Africa is increasing and general practitioners are treating a growing number of older patients.1,2 Geriatric patients often have multiple underlying conditions, and because of this complexity, consulting with older adults may be daunting.3 There is a critical shortage of geriatricians in South Africa and the general practitioner often has to take on the role of overseer. By applying the mnemonic ‘COMMON SENSE’, which is being coined in this article (see Box 1), important considerations and common conditions affecting older adults are less likely to be missed. Awareness of these geriatric syndromes enables clinicians to utilise simple targeted screening tools to identify conditions that may not be immediately apparent, thereby optimising the quality of care provided to older patients. As only 15–20 min is allocate to a general practice consultation, not every condition can be assessed in this short time, and individualised care is necessary to decide which components to tackle in each appointment. An hour-long booking for a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) would be ideal.
BOX 1: The components of COMMON SENSE. |
The comprehensive geriatric assessment
The CGA is the cornerstone of geriatric medicine, taking into account all the components of the COMMON SENSE mnemonic (see Figure 1). It enhances the well-established biopsychosocial model by emphasising the critical interplay of these three vital components, while integrating cognitive and functional assessments to provide a more comprehensive approach to patient care. The CGA is a multidimensional approach to care of the older person underscoring the need for a multidisciplinary team approach.4 The members of this team include all allied health professionals, often various medical practitioners, pharmacists and nursing staff. This framework facilitates the creation of a comprehensive problem list and the development of an individually tailored care plan. The care plans, along with the implemented interventions, should be regularly reviewed and adjusted as necessary. The CGA can be utilised in a variety of settings, both inpatient and outpatient. It is particularly valuable when a general practitioner is managing a frail older adult with multiple geriatric syndromes, during transitions in care settings and following hospital discharge.4,5,6 The remainder of this article will discuss the individual components of the CGA with a focus on the COMMON SENSE components and will discuss the most time and cost-effective screening tools to assess these common problems.
 |
FIGURE 1: The comprehensive geriatric assessment with the COMMON SENSE components. |
|
The 5 Ms and the geriatric syndromes
Geriatric syndromes are common conditions that occur in older adults as a result of multiple contributing factors.7 Consequences of these syndromes are the loss of independence, deteriorating health, higher healthcare costs, the need for institutionalised care, morbidity and mortality.7 In 2017, the 5 Ms (see Box 1) were introduced to help those practitioners who care for older patients to identify common geriatric problems.8 The 5Ms take into account many of the geriatric syndromes including delirium, dementia, depression, falls and instability, polypharmacy, multimorbidity and goals of care.8 There are a few other syndromes, however, that deserve mention, including loneliness, frailty, sarcopenia, malnutrition, incontinence and iatrogenesis. Iatrogenesis comes in many forms and may result from medications, adverse drug events, or complications from procedures, which may be diagnostic or therapeutic. These syndromes are frequently underdiagnosed because of the complexities involved in managing older adults.
Optimisation of the older adult
The main goals of successful ageing are to keep the older adult as functional as possible for as long as possible, and as this is a multidimensional concept, successful ageing incorporates all the CGA components including functional, cognitive, social and psychological well-being.9 One way to achieve this is to optimise medication and treatment regimes, optimise function, aim for appropriate therapeutic targets and make use of preventative strategies.
Functional status is the ability of the older adult to look after themselves and perform the activities of daily living required of them to live independently.9 Box 215,16,17 shows both the basic and instrumental activities of daily living. If a person cannot perform instrumental activities of daily living safely by themselves, then they will require help – either at home or in a mid-care type setting. Inability to complete certain instrumental activities independently such as driving, administering medication and taking care of financial affairs can pose a physical or financial safety threat. Those who cannot perform basic activities of daily living independently, such as eating, toileting and transferring from a bed to a chair will require 24-h care either at home or in a frail-care setting.
BOX 2: Activities of daily living. |
Targets for common conditions such as type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension depend on the person’s functional and frailty status. While tighter control of both blood pressure and glucose measurements are recommended for healthy older adults who are able to complete all their own instrumental activities of daily living and who are not frail, systolic blood pressures of 150 mmHg10 and heamoglobin A1C (HbA1C) measurements of between 7% and 8.5%11 are acceptable for those patients who have multiple chronic long-term conditions, who are frail and who are nearing end of life.
Optimising medications is vitally important because inappropriate polypharmacy, taking more medications than are medically necessary or using medication that is ineffective, can lead to deleterious consequences such as adverse drug reactions, morbidity and mortality.12 Useful tools that can be used to assist with rationalising medications include the use of drug-interaction checkers, the Beers criteria and the STOPP/START criteria (see Table 1).13,14
TABLE 1: The simplest screening tools that can be implemented in primary care practice for the common geriatric syndromes. |
Other optimisation strategies include vaccinations and the screening for osteoporosis and common malignancies such as those arising from the prostate, breast and colon. The decision to undergo certain screening tests depends on whether the benefits outweigh the risks, personal preferences and the likelihood that the patient will live long enough to experience the benefits of treating any conditions that are diagnosed.
Social and care needs of the older adult
Choosing the most appropriate care setting is dependent on the cognitive and functional status of the older person. Other factors that need to be taken into account include the availability of social support networks and finances. Frail-care facilities can be expensive and the waiting times for admission can be long. A poor support system can result in loneliness, which itself is a risk factor for poor health.18 Older adults constitute a vulnerable population and are therefore safeguarded by the Older Persons Act,19 which mandates the reporting of any suspected abuse or neglect against an older person.20
Advance care planning and end of life decisions become increasingly more important to discuss as the older adult becomes frailer. Discussions around healthcare proxies, expectations at the end of life and living wills cannot be adequately addressed in the last few minutes of a consultation, and a healthcare practitioner who has an established and trusted relationship with the patient is best suited to initiate these discussions.21 Currently, there is no law in South Africa to validate a living will; however, there is an ethical expectation from the patient who has a living will that their wishes will be followed.22
Simple screening tools
A number of screening tools and toolkits are available to assist in best diagnosing the various geriatric syndromes. As a result of both time and resource constraints in the primary care setting, a simple screening of the major geriatric syndromes would be sufficient to screen for the majority of these syndromes (see Table 1). Those who are flagged can then be interrogated in more depth or referred on to the appropriate clinician or allied healthcare worker.6 The CGA itself can take up to 2 hours to complete and this is usually not possible during the course of a single short consultation.
For certain syndromes such as hearing impairment and poor vision, a simple yes or no question asking if there are any problems is adequate. Screening for every syndrome is sometimes not achievable in the course of a consultation, and for a busy practice, the most important syndromes to ask about would be falls, memory problems and to perform a medication review. The Timed-Up-and-Go (TUG) takes a few seconds and gives a wealth of information.23 Difficulty in getting up from the chair may indicate proximal muscle weakness; gait abnormalities can be seen and characterised when the patient walks the three metres, and both static and dynamic balance problems can be detected. Screening for cognition can be performed by administering the simple mini-cog, which provides information on many aspects of cognition.24 Both immediate and delayed recall are tested with the three words and executive function, planning and sequencing with the clock drawing test.
Conclusion
Geriatric syndromes are common and often difficult to diagnose. Assessment tools can be a simple and cost-effective means to diagnose these syndromes. In addition to the standard history and examination, using a simple mnemonic ‘COMMON SENSE’ allows the primary care physician to remember the important components of the geriatric assessment.
Acknowledgements
Competing interests
The author declares that they have no financial or personal relationships that may have inappropriately influenced them in writing this article.
Author’s contributions
L.S.G. is the sole author of this article.
Ethical considerations
This article followed all ethical standards for a research without direct contact with human or animal subjects.
Funding information
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Data availability
The raw data are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author, L.S.G.
Disclaimer
The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and are the product of professional research. The article does not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any affiliated institution, funder, agency, or that of the publisher. The author is responsible for this article’s results, findings, and content.
References
- World Health Organization. World report on ageing and health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015.
- Naidoo K, Van Wyk J. What the elderly experience and expect from primary care services in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2019;11(1):2100. https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v11i1.2100
- Bell SP, Vasilevskis EE, Saraf AA, et al. Geriatric syndromes in hospitalized older adults discharged to skilled nursing facilities. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016;64(4):715–722. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.14035
- Pilotto A, Cella A, Pilotto A, et al. Three decades of comprehensive geriatric assessment: Evidence coming from different healthcare settings and specific clinical conditions. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017;18(2):192.e1–192.e11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2016.11.004
- Parker SG, McCue P, Phelps K, et al. What is comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA)? An umbrella review. Age Ageing. 2017;47(1):149–155. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afx166
- Little MO. The rapid geriatric assessment: A quick screen for geriatric syndromes. Mo Med. 2017;114(2):101–104.
- Inouye SK, Studenski S, Tinetti ME, Kuchel GA. Geriatric syndromes: Clinical, research, and policy implications of a core geriatric concept. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55(5):780–791. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01156.x
- Molnar F, Frank CC. Optimizing geriatric care with the GERIATRIC 5Ms. Can Fam Physician. 2019;65(1):39.
- Urtamo A, Jyväkorpi SK, Strandberg TE. Definitions of successful ageing: A brief review of a multidimensional concept. Acta Biomed. 2019;90(2):359–363.
- Alsarah A, Alsara O, Bachauwa G. Hypertension management in the elderly: What is the optimal target blood pressure? Heart Views. 2019;20(1):11–16. https://doi.org/10.4103/HEARTVIEWS.HEARTVIEWS_28_18
- Webb D. 2017 SEMDSA diabetes management guidelines. S Afr J Diabetes Vasc Dis. 2018;15(1):37–40.
- Masnoon N, Shakib S, Kalisch-Ellett L, Caughey GE. What is polypharmacy? A systematic review of definitions. BMC Geriatr. 2017;17(1):230. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-017-0621-2
- By the 2023 American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria® Update Expert Panel. American Geriatrics Society 2023 updated AGS Beers Criteria® for potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023;71(7):2052–2081. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.18372
- O’Mahony D, Cherubini A, Guiteras AR, et al. STOPP/START criteria for potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people: Version 3. Eur Geriatr Med. 2023;14(4):625–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-023-00777-y
- Katz S, Downs TD, Cash HR, Grotz RC. Progress in development of the index of ADL. Gerontologist. 1970;10(1):20–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/10.1_Part_1.20
- Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: Self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist. 1969;9(3):179–186. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/9.3_Part_1.179
- Knoll K, Rhee Y, Hamm JM, et al. The prevalence and trends of instrumental activities of daily living impairments in the United States from 2008–2018. J Alzheimers Dis Rep. 2023;7(1):271–278. https://doi.org/10.3233/ADR-220107
- Holmén K, Furukawa H. Loneliness, health and social network among elderly people – A follow-up study. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2002;35(3):261–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4943(02)00049-3
- Older Persons Act 13 of 2006 RoSAGGCOAfPGP. South African Government.
- Noyoo N. Reflecting on the human rights of older persons in South Africa. J Hum Rights Soc Work. 2017;2(4):108–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41134-017-0039-y
- De Vleminck A, Houttekier D, Pardon K, et al. Barriers and facilitators for general practitioners to engage in advance care planning: A systematic review. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2013;31(4):215–226. https://doi.org/10.3109/02813432.2013.854590
- Kotzé C, Roos JL. End-of-life care in South Africa: Important legal developments. S Afr J Psychiatr. 2022;28:1748. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajpsychiatry.v28i0.1748
- Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed ‘up & go’: A test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991;39(2):142–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb01616.x
- Borson S, Scanlan J, Brush M, Vitaliano P, Dokmak A. The mini-cog: A cognitive ‘vital signs’ measure for dementia screening in multi-lingual elderly. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2000;15(11):1021–107. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1166(200011)15:11%3C1021::AID-GPS234%3E3.0.CO;2-6
- Abayomi SN, Sritharan P, Yan E, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of the Mini-Cog screening tool for the detection of cognitive impairment – A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2024;19(3):e0298686. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0298686
- Tsoi KK, Chan JY, Hirai HW, Wong SY. Comparison of diagnostic performance of two-question screen and 15 depression screening instruments for older adults: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2017;210(4):255–260. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.116.186932
- Morley JE, Malmstrom TK, Miller DK. A simple frailty questionnaire (FRAIL) predicts outcomes in middle aged African Americans. J Nutr Health Aging. 2012;16(7):601–608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-012-0084-2
- Sukkriang N, Punsawad C. Comparison of geriatric assessment tools for frailty among community elderly. Heliyon. 2020;6(9):e04797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04797
- Kaiser MJ, Bauer JM, Ramsch C, et al. Validation of the mini nutritional assessment short-form (MNA®-SF): A practical tool for identification of nutritional status. J Nutr Health Aging. 2009;13(9):782–788. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-009-0214-7
- Lau S, Pek K, Chew J. The simplified nutritional appetite questionnaire (SNAQ) as a screening tool for risk of malnutrition: Optimal cutoff, factor structure, and validation in healthy community-dwelling older adults. Nutrients. 2020;12(9):2885. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12092885
- Schoene D, Wu SM, Mikolaizak AS, et al. Discriminative ability and predictive validity of the timed up and go test in identifying older people who fall: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013;61(2):202–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.12106
- Barry E, Galvin R, Keogh C, Horgan F, Fahey T. Is the timed up and go test a useful predictor of risk of falls in community dwelling older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Geriatr. 2014;14:14. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-14-14
- Brown JS, Bradley CS, Subak LL, et al. The sensitivity and specificity of a simple test to distinguish between urge and stress urinary incontinence. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144:715–723. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-144-10-200605160-00005
- Malmstrom TK, Morley JE. SARC-F: A simple questionnaire to rapidly diagnose sarcopenia. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013;14(8):531–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2013.05.018
- Voelker SN, Michalopoulos N, Maier AB, Reijnierse EM. Reliability and concurrent validity of the SARC-F and its modified versions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021;22(9):1864–1876.e16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2021.05.011
|