Original Research

Risk factors for Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales infections: A case-control study

Sibongakonke Mbele, Sandeep D. Vasaikar
South African Family Practice | Vol 67, No 1 : Part 1| a6029 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/safp.v67i1.6029 | © 2025 Sibongakonke Mbele, Sandeep D. Vasaikar | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 26 August 2024 | Published: 07 February 2025

About the author(s)

Sibongakonke Mbele, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Walter Sisulu University, Mthatha, South Africa
Sandeep D. Vasaikar, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Walter Sisulu University, Mthatha, South Africa

Abstract

Background: Over years, concerning Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) have advanced globally, posing a major threat to global health. Prior studies highlight previous antibiotic use and prolonged hospital stays as paramount risk factors for CRE infections. However, there are limited reports available with a focus on identifying risk factors for CRE infections by comparing CRE cases with controls. The aim is to evaluate factors associated with CRE infections among individuals admitted to hospitals in Mthatha.

Methods: A retrospective case-control study among patients who attended Nelson Mandela Academic Hospital (NMAH) and Mthatha Regional Hospital (MRH), Eastern Cape, South Africa. Demographic, medical history and current hospitalisation factors were captured on clinical research forms. GraphPad Prism version 8 software was used for statistical analysis.

Results: Out of the 226 participants with CRE infection, CRE cases were more likely than controls to be adults (51.9%, odds ratio [OR]: 1.34, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.72–2.55) and of male sex (54.9%, OR: 1.48, 95% CI: 0,87–2,45). Significant risk factors for CRE infections included underlying illnesses (OR: 2.55, 95% CI: 1.41–4.60, p = 0.002), urine catheterisation (OR: 5.40, 95% CI: 1.45–18.33, p = 0.01), intravascular devices (OR: 2.48, 95% CI: 1.06–6.03, p = 0.05) and prolonged hospital stay (OR: 1.87, 95% CI: 1.01–3.39, p = 0.048). CRE cases compared to controls were almost twice as likely to demise or have an extended hospital stay of more than one month. Klebsiella pneumoniae (62.6%) and Enterobacter cloacae (60.6%) were prevalent Enterobacterales associated with CRE.

Conclusion: Significant risk factors for CRE infections are underlying illnesses, urine catheterisation, intravascular devices and prolonged hospitalisation.

Contribution: The complicated nature of CRE infections highlights the importance of targeted interventions to mitigate their spread and impact on public health.


Keywords

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE); Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE); CRE infections; CRE risk factors; carbapenemase genes.

Sustainable Development Goal

Goal 3: Good health and well-being

Metrics

Total abstract views: 1475
Total article views: 1439


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.