Original Research

Teledermatology in a Rural Family Practice

D. O'Mahony, L. Banach, D.H. Mahapa, E.W. Lancaster, G.D. van der Linde, B.H. Williams, R.F. Herring, S.A. Asvadi
South African Family Practice | Vol 25, No 6 | a2031 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/safp.v25i6.2031 | ©
Submitted: 03 October 2011 | Published: 30 December 2002

About the author(s)

D. O'Mahony, Port St Johns, South Africa
L. Banach, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Transkei, South Africa
D.H. Mahapa, Department of Dermatology, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, South Africa
E.W. Lancaster, Department of Pathology, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, South Africa
G.D. van der Linde, Department of Pathology, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, South Africa
B.H. Williams, Department of Telemedicine, Armed Forces lnstitute of Pathology, United States
R.F. Herring, Department of Telemedicine, Armed Forces lnstitute of Pathology, United States
S.A. Asvadi, Lemuel Shattuck Hospital, United States

Full Text:

PDF (3MB)

Abstract

Background: Telemedicine can provide specialist services at a distance to rural areas where access to such services is limited, especially in developing countries. The objectives of this study are to describe and evaluate a teledermatology service in a rural family practice.

Methods: Internet-based store-and-forward technology was used. Patients were selected who needed a specialist dermatologist's opinion for diagnosis and management. Pictures of skin conditions were taken with a digital camera and forwarded, together with clinical data, via electronic mail (e-mail) to specialist dermatologists at either of three distant academic centres. Digital pictures of skin biopsies were also forwarded from the regional pathology laboratory. Results were received via e-mail.

Results: Over a twenty-one month period, fifty-two patients had teledermatology consultations. Picture quality was adequate for evaluation in all cases. The family practitioner's provisional diagnosis, compared to the teledermatologists, was correct in 28 (57%) of 49 cases where a definite diagnosis was made. Six patients needed referral to a dermatology clinic. The most common diagnoses (number) were rinea (8), acquired immune-deficiency syndrome associated papulopruritic eruption (3), photosensitive dermatitis (3) scleroderma or morphea (3), pryriasis rosea (2), psoriasis (2) and systemic lupus erythematosis (2).

Conclusion: Most patients with dermatology problems in rural family practice can be managed by means of store-and-forward teledermatology.


Keywords

teledermatology; telemedicine; dermatology; family practice

Metrics

Total abstract views: 1306
Total article views: 2479


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.