Open Forum
Drawing lessons from the standard treatment guidelines and essential medicines list concept in South Africa as the country moves towards national health insurance
South African Family Practice | Vol 63, No 1 : Part 1| a5145 |
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/safp.v63i1.5145
| © 2021 Velisha A. Perumal-Pillay, Fatima Suleman
| This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 20 May 2020 | Published: 12 January 2021
Submitted: 20 May 2020 | Published: 12 January 2021
About the author(s)
Velisha A. Perumal-Pillay, Discipline of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South AfricaFatima Suleman, Discipline of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
Abstract
The essential medicines concept is recognised as an instrument to improve medicines access and to promote cost-effective use of health resources. South Africa adopted the concept and implemented the Standard Treatment Guidelines and Essential Medicines List (STGs/EML) in 1996 when the National Drug Policy for South Africa was launched. The STGs/EML was meant to address the inequities in medicines access and use and to ensure a standard of care to all citizens, yet these inequities still exist. The implementation of the new National Health Insurance (NHI) scheme is envisaged to relieve this healthcare inequity. The STGs/EML still forms the basis of care in the public sector, but a critique of implementing this tool and lessons that can be applied from this implementation for NHI are lacking. This piece addresses these shortfalls and highlights questions surrounding the implementation of the STGs/EML.
Keywords
essential medicines lists; health systems strengthening; national health insurance; South Africa; standard treatment guidelines
Metrics
Total abstract views: 3429Total article views: 4168