Review Articles
Making sense of statistics for family practitioners: Prevalence or incidence - pedantic or important?
South African Family Practice | Vol 45, No 2 | a1996 |
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/safp.v45i2.1996
| © 2003
| This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 22 September 2011 | Published: 31 May 2003
Submitted: 22 September 2011 | Published: 31 May 2003
About the author(s)
David N. Durrheim, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, James Cook University, AustraliaGboyega A. Ogunbanjo, Department of Family Medicine and Primary Health Care, Sefako Makgatho University, South Africa
Full Text:
PDF (1MB)Abstract
The most effective way to infuriate an epidemiologist is to call a "prevalence rate" an "incidence rate", or vice versa. Unfortunately, this diabolical practice remains a common feature in print, during presentations at medical references and in conversations between medical colleagues. You may, ask whether this confusion of terminology deserves mention in this column. Our answer is an emphatic "yes"! An incorrect understanding of incidence and prevalence can have disastrous effects on planning, whether within an individual practice or a global public health programme.
Keywords
No related keywords in the metadata.
Metrics
Total abstract views: 1500Total article views: 1746