Review Articles

Making sense of statistics for family practitioners: Prevalence or incidence - pedantic or important?

David N. Durrheim, Gboyega A. Ogunbanjo
South African Family Practice | Vol 45, No 2 | a1996 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/safp.v45i2.1996 | © 2003 | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 22 September 2011 | Published: 31 May 2003

About the author(s)

David N. Durrheim, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, James Cook University, Australia
Gboyega A. Ogunbanjo, Department of Family Medicine and Primary Health Care, Sefako Makgatho University, South Africa

Full Text:

PDF (1MB)

Abstract

The most effective way to infuriate an epidemiologist is to call a "prevalence rate" an "incidence rate", or vice versa. Unfortunately, this diabolical practice remains a common feature in print, during presentations at medical references and in conversations between medical colleagues. You may, ask whether this confusion of terminology deserves mention in this column. Our answer is an emphatic "yes"! An incorrect understanding of incidence and prevalence can have disastrous effects on planning, whether within an individual practice or a global public health programme.

Keywords

No related keywords in the metadata.

Metrics

Total abstract views: 1298
Total article views: 1679


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.